linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] media: add a subsystem profile documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210301144741.11a5751b@coco.lan>
Date:   Mon, 1 Mar 2021 14:47:41 +0100
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To:     Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Cc:     Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        linuxarm@...wei.com, mauro.chehab@...wei.com,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] media: add a subsystem profile documentation

Em Mon, 1 Mar 2021 13:27:39 +0100
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl> escreveu:

> Hi Mauro,
> 

Thanks for your review. I'm addressing the points on a v5.

Yet, there's one that, IMHO, we should elaborate more, if we add it to the
doc:

> > +Provided that your patch is at https://patchwork.linuxtv.org, it should
> > +be sooner or later handled, so you don't need to re-submit a patch.
> > +
> > +Except for bug fixes, we don't usually add new patches to the development
> > +tree between -rc6 and the next -rc1.
> > +
> > +Please notice that the media subsystem is a high traffic one, so it
> > +could take a while for us to be able to review your patches. Feel free
> > +to ping if you don't get a feedback in a couple of weeks or to ask
> > +other developers to publicly add Reviewed-by and, more importantly,
> > +Tested-by tags.  
> 
> What I have noticed is that sometimes important bug fixes are missed due
> to the high traffic volume. I would like to see something along the lines of:
> 
> "If important bug fixes are not reviewed or picked up within a week of posting,
> then do not hesitate to ping."

I see your point, but "important" is relative ;-) I mean, a bug
is almost always important for the one reporting it. It doesn't
necessarily means that such bug is visible by others or if the
subsystem's core has a serious bug.

IMO, if we add a paragraph like that, we should better explain what
"important" means.

Thanks,
Mauro