linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add device tree node for LLCC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 28 Feb 2021 20:21:52 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add device tree node for LLCC

Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2021-02-27 05:58:25)
> On 2021-02-27 00:15, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2021-02-26 00:04:27)
> >> On 2021-02-26 01:07, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> > Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2021-02-25 01:30:19)
> >> >> Add a DT node for Last level cache (aka. system cache)
> >> >> controller which provides control over the last level
> >> >> cache present on SC7280 SoC.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
> >> >> ---
> >> >
> >> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> >> >
> >> > Should add system-cache-controller to the devicetree spec. Or just use
> >> > cache-controller for the node name.
> >> 
> >> This was as per discussion in [1][2] where dt-schema throws an error
> >> since it expects cache-level to be associated with cache-controller.
> >> 
> > 
> > Ah right. Can you add system-cache-controller to the dt spec?
> 
> Sure, I'll add it. Hopefully that won't have to block this change?
> Because I might need some time to get permissions to add it there.
> 

Doesn't block it for me.