[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a34de30-6de2-8985-ef6f-5873228a3231@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 09:04:53 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, kuba@...nel.org, will@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add lockdep_assert_not_held()
On 3/1/21 4:02 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 10:45:32AM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 05:06:57PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>>>> Shuah Khan (3):
>>>>> lockdep: add lockdep_assert_not_held()
>>>>> lockdep: add lockdep lock state defines
>>>>> ath10k: detect conf_mutex held ath10k_drain_tx() calls
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Via which tree should these go?
>>
>> I've just queued the lot for locking/core, which will show up in tip
>> when the robots don't hate on it.
>>
>> Does that work for you?
>
> That's perfect, thanks! Just making sure that the patches don't get
> lost.
>
Awesome. Thank you.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists