linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 63/93] blk-settings: align max_sectors on "logical_block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210301161009.997039050@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  1 Mar 2021 17:13:15 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
        Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 63/93] blk-settings: align max_sectors on "logical_block_size" boundary

From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>

commit 97f433c3601a24d3513d06f575a389a2ca4e11e4 upstream.

We get I/O errors when we run md-raid1 on the top of dm-integrity on the
top of ramdisk.
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xff00, 0xff
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xff00, 0xff
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xffff, 0x1
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xffff, 0x1
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8048, 0xff
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8147, 0xff
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8246, 0xff
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8345, 0xbb

The ramdisk device has logical_block_size 512 and max_sectors 255. The
dm-integrity device uses logical_block_size 4096 and it doesn't affect the
"max_sectors" value - thus, it inherits 255 from the ramdisk. So, we have
a device with max_sectors not aligned on logical_block_size.

The md-raid device sees that the underlying leg has max_sectors 255 and it
will split the bios on 255-sector boundary, making the bios unaligned on
logical_block_size.

In order to fix the bug, we round down max_sectors to logical_block_size.

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 block/blk-settings.c |   12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

--- a/block/blk-settings.c
+++ b/block/blk-settings.c
@@ -494,6 +494,14 @@ void blk_queue_stack_limits(struct reque
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_stack_limits);

+static unsigned int blk_round_down_sectors(unsigned int sectors, unsigned int lbs)
+{
+	sectors = round_down(sectors, lbs >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
+	if (sectors < PAGE_SIZE >> SECTOR_SHIFT)
+		sectors = PAGE_SIZE >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
+	return sectors;
+}
+
 /**
  * blk_stack_limits - adjust queue_limits for stacked devices
  * @t:	the stacking driver limits (top device)
@@ -606,6 +614,10 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits
 		ret = -1;
 	}

+	t->max_sectors = blk_round_down_sectors(t->max_sectors, t->logical_block_size);
+	t->max_hw_sectors = blk_round_down_sectors(t->max_hw_sectors, t->logical_block_size);
+	t->max_dev_sectors = blk_round_down_sectors(t->max_dev_sectors, t->logical_block_size);
+
 	/* Discard alignment and granularity */
 	if (b->discard_granularity) {
 		alignment = queue_limit_discard_alignment(b, start);