lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 01 Mar 2021 23:34:40 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@...eaurora.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: constify of_phandle_args in snd_soc_get_dai_name()

On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 16:30:24 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The pointer to of_phandle_args passed to snd_soc_get_dai_name() and
> of_xlate_dai_name() implementations is not modified.  Since it is being
> used only to translate passed OF node to a DAI name, it should not be
> modified, so mark it as const for correctness and safer code.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: constify of_phandle_args in snd_soc_get_dai_name()
      commit: 54928c5c63c83afd5a1c2a91802a9c37e9a4ff88

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ