[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210302034603.4vt5ix5oxjtiilg7@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 09:16:03 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Jie Deng <jie.deng@...el.com>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
conghui.chen@...el.com, kblaiech@...lanox.com,
jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
Sergey Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, loic.poulain@...aro.org,
Tali Perry <tali.perry1@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
yu1.wang@...el.com, shuo.a.liu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver
On 01-03-21, 16:46, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> But the driver does not support this at all: the sglist always has three
> members as Viresh says: outhdr, msgbuf and inhdr. It then uses a
> bounce buffer for the actual data transfer, and this always goes either
> one way or the other.
Yes and if the driver doesn't support the specification fully then it
should say so in a comment at least and also fail in case someone
tries a full duplex transfer..
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists