[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6113ab65-7b3c-07f0-2813-76ddaa4c7236@kleine-koenig.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 09:30:41 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the powerpc-fixes tree
Hello,
On 3/2/21 3:09 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> writes:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the powerpc-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c:5399:13: error: conflicting types for 'ibmvnic_remove'
>> 5399 | static void ibmvnic_remove(struct vio_dev *dev)
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c:81:12: note: previous declaration of 'ibmvnic_remove' was here
>> 81 | static int ibmvnic_remove(struct vio_dev *);
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> Caused by commit
>>
>> 1bdd1e6f9320 ("vio: make remove callback return void")
>
> Gah, is IBMVNIC in any of our defconfigs?! ... no it's not.
Would you accept a patch to add the driver to one of the defconfigs as
an excuse for the build breakage I created? Which would be appropriate?
ppc64_defconfig?
>> I have applied the following patch for today:
>
> Thanks, I'll squash it in.
Also thanks for catching to Stephen and to Michael for the fixup.
Best regards
Uwe
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists