[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YD36O5wCpSElA9Fi@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 09:41:31 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] x86/kprobes: Use int3 instead of debug trap for
single-step
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 11:08:15PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Use int3 instead of debug trap exception for single-stepping the
> probed instructions. Some instructions which change the ip
> registers or modify IF flags are emulated because those are not
> able to be single-stepped by int3 or may allow the interrupt
> while single-stepping.
>
> This actually changes the kprobes behavior.
>
> - kprobes can not probe following instructions; int3, iret,
> far jmp/call which get absolute address as immediate,
> indirect far jmp/call, indirect near jmp/call with addressing
> by memory (register-based indirect jmp/call are OK), and
> vmcall/vmlaunch/vmresume/vmxoff.
>
> - If the kprobe post_handler doesn't set before registering,
> it may not be called in some case even if you set it afterwards.
> (IOW, kprobe booster is enabled at registration, user can not
> change it)
>
> But both are rare issue, unsupported instructions will not be
> used in the kernel (or rarely used), and post_handlers are
> rarely used (I don't see it except for the test code).
>
> Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Very nice!
Aside of a few nits:
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists