[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNPOJfL_qsSZYRbwMUrxnXxtF5L3k9hursZZ7k9H1jLEuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 09:58:19 +0100
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1] powerpc: Enable KFENCE for PPC32
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 09:37, Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy@...roup.eu> wrote:
> Add architecture specific implementation details for KFENCE and enable
> KFENCE for the ppc32 architecture. In particular, this implements the
> required interface in <asm/kfence.h>.
Nice!
> KFENCE requires that attributes for pages from its memory pool can
> individually be set. Therefore, force the Read/Write linear map to be
> mapped at page granularity.
>
> Unit tests succeed on all tests but one:
>
> [ 15.053324] # test_invalid_access: EXPECTATION FAILED at mm/kfence/kfence_test.c:636
> [ 15.053324] Expected report_matches(&expect) to be true, but is false
> [ 15.068359] not ok 21 - test_invalid_access
This is strange, given all the other tests passed. Do you mind sharing
the full test log?
Thanks,
-- Marco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists