[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cced67ae-ceca-3812-121c-70e0ed104f49@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 16:40:12 +0800
From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
yangerkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>,
Cheng Jian <cj.chengjian@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 21/57] proc: dont allow async path resolution of
/proc/self components
Hi,
On 2020/12/1 16:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
>
> [ Upstream commit 8d4c3e76e3be11a64df95ddee52e99092d42fc19 ]
>
> If this is attempted by a kthread, then return -EOPNOTSUPP as we don't
> currently support that. Once we can get task_pid_ptr() doing the right
> thing, then this can go away again.
https://www.spinics.net/lists/io-uring/msg05297.html
This patch seems used for io-wq worker which is merged in
v5.5-rc1, why we need this in linux-4.19.y ?
Thanks,
Yang
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> ---
> fs/proc/self.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/self.c b/fs/proc/self.c
> index cc6d4253399d1..7922edf70ce1a 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/self.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/self.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,13 @@ static const char *proc_self_get_link(struct dentry *dentry,
> pid_t tgid = task_tgid_nr_ns(current, ns);
> char *name;
>
> + /*
> + * Not currently supported. Once we can inherit all of struct pid,
> + * we can allow this.
> + */
> + if (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> +
> if (!tgid)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> /* max length of unsigned int in decimal + NULL term */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists