linux-kernel - Re: [x86, build] 6dafca9780: WARNING:at_arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c:#ftrace_verify

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 2 Mar 2021 10:19:47 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [x86, build] 6dafca9780:
 WARNING:at_arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c:#ftrace_verify_code

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 08:15:26PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> index 7edbd5ee5ed4..e8afc765e00a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
>  
>  static int ftrace_poke_late = 0;
> +static const char p6_nop[] = { P6_NOP5 };

I don't understand this approach, why not simply rewrite all the nops at
boot and not worry about it when modifying the code later?