linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v4 6/9] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DM6PR04MB65752B178AD8CC166D165882FC999@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Mar 2021 09:32:42 +0000
From:   Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To:     "daejun7.park@...sung.com" <daejun7.park@...sung.com>,
        "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@...sung.com>,
        ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        "asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        Zang Leigang <zangleigang@...ilicon.com>,
        Avi Shchislowski <Avi.Shchislowski@....com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        "cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>,
        "stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 6/9] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

> 
> Hi Avri,
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
> > index cf704b82e72a..f33aa28e0a0a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
> > @@ -642,7 +642,8 @@ int ufshpb_prep(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct
> ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
> >                  if (rgn->reads == ACTIVATION_THRESHOLD)
> >                          activate = true;
> >                  spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rgn->rgn_lock, flags);
> > -                if (activate) {
> > +                if (activate ||
> > +                    test_and_clear_bit(RGN_FLAG_UPDATE, &rgn->rgn_flags)) {
> 
> How about merge rgn->rgn_flags to rgn_state?
This will actually not work, because a region can be e.g. active/inactive and dirty,
And I don't want to mess with the regions state machine.

Thanks,
Avri

> 
> Thanks,
> Daejun