lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 2 Mar 2021 10:56:55 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, pavel@...x.de,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        LTP List <ltp@...ts.linux.it>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/661] 5.10.20-rc2 review

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 03:20:32PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Hi Greg and Linus,
> 
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 12:45, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 01:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.20 release.
> > > There are 661 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Wed, 03 Mar 2021 19:34:53 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.20-rc2.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> >
> > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > Regressions detected on all devices (arm64, arm, x86_64 and i386).
> >
> > hangup01    1  TFAIL  :  hangup01.c:133: unexpected message 3
> >
> > This failure is specific to stable-rc 5.10 and 5.11.
> > Test PASS on mainline and Linux next kernel.
> >
> 
> I have reverted these two patches and the test case got PASS
> on Linux version 5.10.20-rc2.
> 
> hangup01 1 TPASS : child process exited with status 0
> 
>    Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
>        tty: implement read_iter
> 
>    Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
>        tty: convert tty_ldisc_ops 'read()' function to take a kernel pointer

Odd.

Is 5.12-rc1 also failing with this test as well?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ