linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH rdma-rc 1/2] RDMA/mlx5: Set correct kernel-doc identifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YD4SxWLbPkEoH3GR@unreal>
Date:   Tue, 2 Mar 2021 12:26:13 +0200
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-rc 1/2] RDMA/mlx5: Set correct kernel-doc identifier

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 09:31:09AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Mar 2021, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> >
> > The W=1 allmodconfig build produces the following warning:
> > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/odp.c:1086: warning: wrong kernel-doc identifier on line:
> >   * Parse a series of data segments for page fault handling.
> >
> > Fix it by changing /** to be /* as it is written in kernel-doc documentation.
> >
> > Fixes: 5e769e444d26 ("RDMA/hw/mlx5/odp: Fix formatting and add missing descriptions in 'pagefault_data_segments()'")
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/odp.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/odp.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/odp.c
> > index 374698186662..b103555b1f5d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/odp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/odp.c
> > @@ -1082,7 +1082,7 @@ static int pagefault_single_data_segment(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev,
> >  	return ret ? ret : npages;
> >  }
> >
> > -/**
> > +/*
>
> This is not the correct fix.

I don't want kernel-doc comments on static function. It is local to this
file, so change from /** to /* was to mark that this is not kernel-doc.

>
> Kernel-doc is asking for the function name.

The thing is that I don't want it to be kernel-doc.

Thanks