[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210302115500.GA76460@shbuild999.sh.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 19:55:00 +0800
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rui.zhang@...el.com,
dave.hansen@...el.com, andi.kleen@...el.com, len.brown@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/tsc: mark tsc reliable for qualified platforms
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 10:14:01AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 10:52:52AM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> > @@ -1193,6 +1193,17 @@ static void __init check_system_tsc_reliable(void)
> > #endif
> > if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE))
> > tsc_clocksource_reliable = 1;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Ideally the socket number should be checked, but this is called
> > + * by tsc_init() which is in early boot phase and the socket numbers
> > + * may not be available. Use 'nr_online_nodes' as a fallback solution
> > + */
> > + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC)
> > + && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC)
> > + && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_ADJUST)
> > + && nr_online_nodes <= 2)
> > + tsc_clocksource_reliable = 1;
>
> Logical operators go at the end of a line and alignment is with the (,
> not the code block after it.
Thanks for pointing out and the suggestion! Will change it to
if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC) &&
boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC) &&
boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_ADJUST) &&
nr_online_nodes <= 2)
tsc_clocksource_reliable = 1;
- Feng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists