linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 02/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add host control mode support to rsp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210302132503.224670-3-avri.altman@wdc.com>
Date:   Tue,  2 Mar 2021 15:24:55 +0200
From:   Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
To:     "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@...sung.com>,
        Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>,
        alim.akhtar@...sung.com, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
        Zang Leigang <zangleigang@...ilicon.com>,
        Avi Shchislowski <avi.shchislowski@....com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>, cang@...eaurora.org,
        stanley.chu@...iatek.com, Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 02/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add host control mode support to rsp_upiu

In device control mode, the device may recommend the host to either
activate or inactivate a region, and the host should follow. Meaning
those are not actually recommendations, but more of instructions.

On the contrary, in host control mode, the recommendation protocol is
slightly changed:
a) The device may only recommend the host to update a subregion of an
   already-active region. And,
b) The device may *not* recommend to inactivate a region.

Furthermore, in host control mode, the host may choose not to follow any
of the device's recommendations. However, in case of a recommendation to
update an active and clean subregion, it is better to follow those
recommendation because otherwise the host has no other way to know that
some internal relocation took place.

Signed-off-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
index d9ea0cddc3c4..044fec9854a0 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
@@ -166,6 +166,8 @@ static void ufshpb_set_ppn_dirty(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb, int rgn_idx,
 	else
 		set_bit_len = cnt;
 
+	set_bit(RGN_FLAG_DIRTY, &rgn->rgn_flags);
+
 	if (rgn->rgn_state != HPB_RGN_INACTIVE &&
 	    srgn->srgn_state == HPB_SRGN_VALID)
 		bitmap_set(srgn->mctx->ppn_dirty, srgn_offset, set_bit_len);
@@ -235,6 +237,11 @@ static bool ufshpb_test_ppn_dirty(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb, int rgn_idx,
 	return false;
 }
 
+static inline bool is_rgn_dirty(struct ufshpb_region *rgn)
+{
+	return test_bit(RGN_FLAG_DIRTY, &rgn->rgn_flags);
+}
+
 static int ufshpb_fill_ppn_from_page(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb,
 				     struct ufshpb_map_ctx *mctx, int pos,
 				     int len, u64 *ppn_buf)
@@ -717,6 +724,7 @@ static void ufshpb_put_map_req(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb,
 static int ufshpb_clear_dirty_bitmap(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb,
 				     struct ufshpb_subregion *srgn)
 {
+	struct ufshpb_region *rgn;
 	u32 num_entries = hpb->entries_per_srgn;
 
 	if (!srgn->mctx) {
@@ -730,6 +738,10 @@ static int ufshpb_clear_dirty_bitmap(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb,
 		num_entries = hpb->last_srgn_entries;
 
 	bitmap_zero(srgn->mctx->ppn_dirty, num_entries);
+
+	rgn = hpb->rgn_tbl + srgn->rgn_idx;
+	clear_bit(RGN_FLAG_DIRTY, &rgn->rgn_flags);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1257,6 +1269,18 @@ static void ufshpb_rsp_req_region_update(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb,
 		srgn_i =
 			be16_to_cpu(rsp_field->hpb_active_field[i].active_srgn);
 
+		rgn = hpb->rgn_tbl + rgn_i;
+		if (hpb->is_hcm &&
+		    (rgn->rgn_state != HPB_RGN_ACTIVE || is_rgn_dirty(rgn))) {
+			/*
+			 * in host control mode, subregion activation
+			 * recommendations are only allowed to active regions.
+			 * Also, ignore recommendations for dirty regions - the
+			 * host will make decisions concerning those by himself
+			 */
+			continue;
+		}
+
 		dev_dbg(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev,
 			"activate(%d) region %d - %d\n", i, rgn_i, srgn_i);
 
@@ -1264,7 +1288,6 @@ static void ufshpb_rsp_req_region_update(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb,
 		ufshpb_update_active_info(hpb, rgn_i, srgn_i);
 		spin_unlock(&hpb->rsp_list_lock);
 
-		rgn = hpb->rgn_tbl + rgn_i;
 		srgn = rgn->srgn_tbl + srgn_i;
 
 		/* blocking HPB_READ */
@@ -1275,6 +1298,14 @@ static void ufshpb_rsp_req_region_update(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb,
 		hpb->stats.rb_active_cnt++;
 	}
 
+	if (hpb->is_hcm) {
+		/*
+		 * in host control mode the device is not allowed to inactivate
+		 * regions
+		 */
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	for (i = 0; i < rsp_field->inactive_rgn_cnt; i++) {
 		rgn_i = be16_to_cpu(rsp_field->hpb_inactive_field[i]);
 		dev_dbg(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev,
@@ -1299,6 +1330,7 @@ static void ufshpb_rsp_req_region_update(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb,
 		hpb->stats.rb_inactive_cnt++;
 	}
 
+out:
 	dev_dbg(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev, "Noti: #ACT %u #INACT %u\n",
 		rsp_field->active_rgn_cnt, rsp_field->inactive_rgn_cnt);
 
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
index 14b7ba9bda3a..8119b1a3d1e5 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
@@ -119,6 +119,8 @@ struct ufshpb_region {
 
 	/* below information is used by lru */
 	struct list_head list_lru_rgn;
+	unsigned long rgn_flags;
+#define RGN_FLAG_DIRTY 0
 };
 
 #define for_each_sub_region(rgn, i, srgn)				\
-- 
2.25.1