[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210302142246.GC220334@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 09:22:46 -0500
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
virtio-fs@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] fuse: Clear SGID bit when setting mode in setacl
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 11:33:24AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 06:33:57PM +0000, Luis Henriques wrote:
> > Setting file permissions with POSIX ACLs (setxattr) isn't clearing the
> > setgid bit. This seems to be CVE-2016-7097, detected by running fstest
> > generic/375 in virtiofs. Unfortunately, when the fix for this CVE landed
> > in the kernel with commit 073931017b49 ("posix_acl: Clear SGID bit when
> > setting file permissions"), FUSE didn't had ACLs support yet.
>
> Hi Luis,
>
> Interesting. I did not know that "chmod" can lead to clearing of SGID
> as well. Recently we implemented FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2 flag which
> means that file server is responsible for clearing of SUID/SGID/caps
> as per following rules.
>
> - caps are always cleared on chown/write/truncate
> - suid is always cleared on chown, while for truncate/write it is cleared
> only if caller does not have CAP_FSETID.
> - sgid is always cleared on chown, while for truncate/write it is cleared
> only if caller does not have CAP_FSETID as well as file has group execute
> permission.
>
> And we don't have anything about "chmod" in this list. Well, I will test
> this and come back to this little later.
Looks like I did not notice the setattr_prepare() call in
fuse_do_setattr() which clears SGID in client itself and server does not
have to do anything extra. So it works.
IOW, FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2 will not handle this particular case and
fuse client will clear SGID on chmod, if need be.
Vivek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists