[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+Te5+kQzbAMCzuRCkmoZWBDKGhynUC8BfvOm=R5jT4Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 08:56:47 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
Daniel Walker <danielwa@...co.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Max Uvarov <muvarov@...il.com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix CMDLINE_EXTEND handling for FDT "bootargs"
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 11:45 AM Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy@...roup.eu> wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 01/03/2021 à 18:26, Rob Herring a écrit :
> > +PPC folks and Daniel W
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 8:42 AM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 08:19:32AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 6:59 AM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>>> We recently [1] enabled support for CMDLINE_EXTEND on arm64, however
> >>>> when I started looking at replacing Android's out-of-tree implementation [2]
> >>>
> >>> Did anyone go read the common, reworked version of all this I
> >>> referenced that supports prepend and append. Here it is again[1].
> >>> Maybe I should have been more assertive there and said 'extend' is
> >>> ambiguous.
> >>
> >> I tried reading that, but (a) most of the series is not in the mailing list
> >> archives and (b) the patch that _is_ doesn't touch CMDLINE_EXTEND at all.
> >> Right now the code in mainline does the opposite of what it's documented to
> >> do.
> >
> > Actually, there is a newer version I found:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/1551469472-53043-1-git-send-email-danielwa@cisco.com/
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/1551469472-53043-2-git-send-email-danielwa@cisco.com/
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/1551469472-53043-3-git-send-email-danielwa@cisco.com/
>
> This was seen as too much intrusive into powerpc.
It looked like the main issue was string functions for KASAN?
As far as being too complex, I think that will be needed if you look
at all architectures and non-DT cases.
> I proposed an alternative at
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/cover/cover.1554195798.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr/ but
> never got any feedback.
Didn't go to a list I subscribe to. In particular, if it had gone to
DT list and into PW you would have gotten a reply from me.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists