linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] parport: Introduce module_parport

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YD5Uc7j2MAFbFWZ3@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Mar 2021 17:06:27 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] parport: Introduce module_parport_driver() helper
 macro

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 02:51:45PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 12:12 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 11:27:10PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 07:03:09PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 01:07:39PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > Introduce module_parport_driver() helper macro to reduce boilerplate
> > > > > in the existing and new code.
> > > >
> > > > Sudip, any comments on this?
> > >
> > > Sorry for the delay in reply.
> > > lgtm. I think there are few more drivers which can also use this new helper.
> > > Will you like to do them also?
> >
> > Yes, that's the (slow going) plan.
> >
> > > Acked-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
> >
> > Thanks! I considered that you take it thru parport tree. Do you have something
> > else in mind?
> 
> I dont have a separate parport tree (parport is not under active
> development to have a separate tree). I send everything parport
> related to Greg and then he adds it to his tree.

MAINTAINERS doesn't show this. But good to know.

> I guess in this case if Greg agrees it can go via Mark's tree as the
> series will also have SPI related patches.

Okay, if Greg wants to handle this himself, I think I have to resend (he wasn't
in the Cc list). Otherwise Mark can also apply this if Greg is okay (but sounds
like I have to resend anyway to let him understand what's going on here).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko