[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YD5Z7Ax6vcAejoqR@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 17:29:48 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
roman.fietze@...na.com, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] [v4] lib/vsprintf: no_hash_pointers prints all
addresses as unhashed
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 03:28:09PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 3:08 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 14:49:42 +0100
> > Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > > > So this is basically a kernel tinyfication issue, right? Is that still pursued
> > > > today? Are there better config options suitable for this than CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL?
> > >
> > > As long as I hear about products running Linux on SoCs with 10 MiB of
> > > SRAM, I think the answer is yes.
> > > I'm not immediately aware of a better config option. There are no more
> > > TINY options left, and EXPERT selects DEBUG_KERNEL.
> >
> > Since the trace_printk() uses the same type of notice, I wonder if we could
> > make this into a helper function and just pass in the top part.
> >
> > + pr_warn("**********************************************************\n");
> > + pr_warn("** NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE **\n");
> > + pr_warn("** **\n");
> >
> >
> > + pr_warn("** This system shows unhashed kernel memory addresses **\n");
> > + pr_warn("** via the console, logs, and other interfaces. This **\n");
> > + pr_warn("** might reduce the security of your system. **\n");
> >
> > Only the above section is really unique. The rest can be a boiler plate.
>
> Good idea. drivers/iommu/iommu-debugfs.c has a third copy.
+1. Let's keep it in some helper that can be added if we have a corresponding
functionality.
> > + pr_warn("** **\n");
> > + pr_warn("** If you see this message and you are not debugging **\n");
> > + pr_warn("** the kernel, report this immediately to your system **\n");
> > + pr_warn("** administrator! **\n");
> > + pr_warn("** **\n");
> > + pr_warn("** NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE **\n");
> > + pr_warn("**********************************************************\n");
>
> Fortunately gcc is already smart enough to deduplicate identical strings,
> but only in the same source file.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists