[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1614705688-10567-1-git-send-email-hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 02:21:28 +0900
From: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@...gle.com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
Subject: [PATCH] swiotlb: Fix type of max_slot
After the refactoring phase, the type of max_slot has changed from unsigned
long to unsigned int. The return type of the function get_max_slots() and
the 4th argument type of iommu_is_span_boundary() are different from the
type of max_slot. Finally, asserts BUG_ON in iommu_is_span_boundary().
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Fixes: 567d877f9a7d ("swiotlb: refactor swiotlb_tbl_map_single")
Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
---
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index 369e4c3..c10e855 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static int find_slots(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr,
unsigned long boundary_mask = dma_get_seg_boundary(dev);
dma_addr_t tbl_dma_addr =
phys_to_dma_unencrypted(dev, io_tlb_start) & boundary_mask;
- unsigned int max_slots = get_max_slots(boundary_mask);
+ unsigned long max_slots = get_max_slots(boundary_mask);
unsigned int iotlb_align_mask =
dma_get_min_align_mask(dev) & ~(IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);
unsigned int nslots = nr_slots(alloc_size), stride;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists