linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio: regmap: fix direction register check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 2 Mar 2021 19:21:59 +0100
From:   Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>
To:     Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: regmap: fix direction register check

Hi Michael,

El 02/03/2021 a las 19:16, Michael Walle escribió:
> Am 2021-03-02 19:06, schrieb Álvaro Fernández Rojas:
>> If there's a direction register, we should also have dat or set 
>> registers.
>> However, we only need one of them, not both.
> 
> Can you give some more context or an example? If there is a direction
> register, we'd need to set and get the value, no?

I've just realized that I need to set reg_set_base to the same value as 
reg_dat_base in my case.
Please, ignore this patch and excuse me :$.

> 
> -michael
> 
>> Fixes: ebe363197e52 ("gpio: add a reusable generic gpio_chip using 
>> regmap")
>> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c
>> index 23b0a8572f53..5a9fca00b5e8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c
>> @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ struct gpio_regmap *gpio_regmap_register(const
>> struct gpio_regmap_config *config
>>
>>      /* if we have a direction register we need both input and output */
>>      if ((config->reg_dir_out_base || config->reg_dir_in_base) &&
>> -        (!config->reg_dat_base || !config->reg_set_base))
>> +        (!config->reg_dat_base && !config->reg_set_base))
>>          return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>
>>      /* we don't support having both registers simultaneously for now */