[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb5b8af1-6f7e-e2a0-0fcb-0de44447c1e6@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 19:21:59 +0100
From: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: regmap: fix direction register check
Hi Michael,
El 02/03/2021 a las 19:16, Michael Walle escribió:
> Am 2021-03-02 19:06, schrieb Álvaro Fernández Rojas:
>> If there's a direction register, we should also have dat or set
>> registers.
>> However, we only need one of them, not both.
>
> Can you give some more context or an example? If there is a direction
> register, we'd need to set and get the value, no?
I've just realized that I need to set reg_set_base to the same value as
reg_dat_base in my case.
Please, ignore this patch and excuse me :$.
>
> -michael
>
>> Fixes: ebe363197e52 ("gpio: add a reusable generic gpio_chip using
>> regmap")
>> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c
>> index 23b0a8572f53..5a9fca00b5e8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c
>> @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ struct gpio_regmap *gpio_regmap_register(const
>> struct gpio_regmap_config *config
>>
>> /* if we have a direction register we need both input and output */
>> if ((config->reg_dir_out_base || config->reg_dir_in_base) &&
>> - (!config->reg_dat_base || !config->reg_set_base))
>> + (!config->reg_dat_base && !config->reg_set_base))
>> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>
>> /* we don't support having both registers simultaneously for now */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists