| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20210302184901.GD26930@x1.vandijck-laurijssen.be>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 19:49:01 +0100
From: Kurt Van Dijck <dev.kurt@...dijck-laurijssen.be>
To: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@...ero.it>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...il.com>,
Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@...wei.com>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] can: c_can: prepare to up the message objects
number
On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 11:38:54 +0100, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 11:38:54 +0100
> From: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@...ero.it>
> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...il.com>, Alexander Stein
> <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>, Dario Binacchi
> <dariobin@...ero.it>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub
> Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, Oliver
> Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>, Vincent Mailhol
> <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
> YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, Zhang Qilong
> <zhangqilong3@...wei.com>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
> netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH v3 5/6] can: c_can: prepare to up the message objects number
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1
>
> As pointed by commit c0a9f4d396c9 ("can: c_can: Reduce register access")
> the "driver casts the 16 message objects in stone, which is completely
> braindead as contemporary hardware has up to 128 message objects".
>
> The patch prepares the module to extend the number of message objects
> beyond the 32 currently managed. This was achieved by transforming the
> constants used to manage RX/TX messages into variables without changing
> the driver policy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@...ero.it>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Use unsigned int instead of int as type of the msg_obj_* fields
> in the c_can_priv structure.
> - Replace (u64)1 with 1UL in msg_obj_rx_mask setting.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Fix compiling error reported by kernel test robot.
> - Add Reported-by tag.
> - Pass larger size to alloc_candev() routine to avoid an additional
> memory allocation/deallocation.
>
> drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++----------
> drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h | 23 ++++++------
> drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_pci.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
> index 7081cfaf62e2..ede6f4d62095 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
> @@ -173,9 +173,6 @@
> /* Wait for ~1 sec for INIT bit */
> #define INIT_WAIT_MS 1000
>
> -/* napi related */
> -#define C_CAN_NAPI_WEIGHT C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_NUM
> -
> /* c_can lec values */
> enum c_can_lec_type {
> LEC_NO_ERROR = 0,
> @@ -325,7 +322,7 @@ static void c_can_setup_tx_object(struct net_device *dev, int iface,
> * first, i.e. clear the MSGVAL flag in the arbiter.
> */
> if (rtr != (bool)test_bit(idx, &priv->tx_dir)) {
> - u32 obj = idx + C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_FIRST;
> + u32 obj = idx + priv->msg_obj_tx_first;
>
> c_can_inval_msg_object(dev, iface, obj);
> change_bit(idx, &priv->tx_dir);
> @@ -463,10 +460,10 @@ static netdev_tx_t c_can_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> * prioritized. The lowest buffer number wins.
> */
> idx = fls(atomic_read(&priv->tx_active));
> - obj = idx + C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_FIRST;
> + obj = idx + priv->msg_obj_tx_first;
>
> /* If this is the last buffer, stop the xmit queue */
> - if (idx == C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_NUM - 1)
> + if (idx == priv->msg_obj_tx_num - 1)
> netif_stop_queue(dev);
> /*
> * Store the message in the interface so we can call
> @@ -549,17 +546,18 @@ static int c_can_set_bittiming(struct net_device *dev)
> */
> static void c_can_configure_msg_objects(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> + struct c_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> int i;
>
> /* first invalidate all message objects */
> - for (i = C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_FIRST; i <= C_CAN_NO_OF_OBJECTS; i++)
> + for (i = priv->msg_obj_rx_first; i <= priv->msg_obj_num; i++)
> c_can_inval_msg_object(dev, IF_RX, i);
>
> /* setup receive message objects */
> - for (i = C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_FIRST; i < C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_LAST; i++)
> + for (i = priv->msg_obj_rx_first; i < priv->msg_obj_rx_last; i++)
> c_can_setup_receive_object(dev, IF_RX, i, 0, 0, IF_MCONT_RCV);
>
> - c_can_setup_receive_object(dev, IF_RX, C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_LAST, 0, 0,
> + c_can_setup_receive_object(dev, IF_RX, priv->msg_obj_rx_last, 0, 0,
> IF_MCONT_RCV_EOB);
> }
>
> @@ -730,7 +728,7 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
> while ((idx = ffs(pend))) {
> idx--;
> pend &= ~(1 << idx);
> - obj = idx + C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_FIRST;
> + obj = idx + priv->msg_obj_tx_first;
> c_can_inval_tx_object(dev, IF_TX, obj);
> can_get_echo_skb(dev, idx, NULL);
> bytes += priv->dlc[idx];
> @@ -740,7 +738,7 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
> /* Clear the bits in the tx_active mask */
> atomic_sub(clr, &priv->tx_active);
>
> - if (clr & (1 << (C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_NUM - 1)))
> + if (clr & (1 << (priv->msg_obj_tx_num - 1)))
> netif_wake_queue(dev);
>
> if (pkts) {
> @@ -755,11 +753,11 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
> * raced with the hardware or failed to readout all upper
> * objects in the last run due to quota limit.
> */
> -static u32 c_can_adjust_pending(u32 pend)
> +static u32 c_can_adjust_pending(u32 pend, u32 rx_mask)
> {
> u32 weight, lasts;
>
> - if (pend == RECEIVE_OBJECT_BITS)
> + if (pend == rx_mask)
> return pend;
>
> /*
> @@ -862,8 +860,7 @@ static int c_can_do_rx_poll(struct net_device *dev, int quota)
> * It is faster to read only one 16bit register. This is only possible
> * for a maximum number of 16 objects.
> */
> - BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_LAST > 16,
> - "Implementation does not support more message objects than 16");
> + WARN_ON(priv->msg_obj_rx_last > 16);
>
> while (quota > 0) {
> if (!pend) {
> @@ -874,7 +871,8 @@ static int c_can_do_rx_poll(struct net_device *dev, int quota)
> * If the pending field has a gap, handle the
> * bits above the gap first.
> */
> - toread = c_can_adjust_pending(pend);
> + toread = c_can_adjust_pending(pend,
> + priv->msg_obj_rx_mask);
> } else {
> toread = pend;
> }
> @@ -1205,17 +1203,31 @@ static int c_can_close(struct net_device *dev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -struct net_device *alloc_c_can_dev(void)
> +struct net_device *alloc_c_can_dev(int msg_obj_num)
> {
> struct net_device *dev;
> struct c_can_priv *priv;
> + int msg_obj_tx_num = msg_obj_num / 2;
IMO, a bigger tx queue is not usefull.
A bigger rx queue however is.
My series last year took a fixed lenght of 8 for tx,
and use the remaining as rx queue.
>
> - dev = alloc_candev(sizeof(struct c_can_priv), C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_NUM);
> + dev = alloc_candev(sizeof(*priv) + sizeof(u32) * msg_obj_tx_num,
> + msg_obj_tx_num);
> if (!dev)
> return NULL;
>
> priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> - netif_napi_add(dev, &priv->napi, c_can_poll, C_CAN_NAPI_WEIGHT);
> + priv->msg_obj_num = msg_obj_num;
> + priv->msg_obj_rx_num = msg_obj_num - msg_obj_tx_num;
> + priv->msg_obj_rx_first = 1;
> + priv->msg_obj_rx_last =
> + priv->msg_obj_rx_first + priv->msg_obj_rx_num - 1;
> + priv->msg_obj_rx_mask = (1UL << priv->msg_obj_rx_num) - 1;
> +
> + priv->msg_obj_tx_num = msg_obj_tx_num;
> + priv->msg_obj_tx_first = priv->msg_obj_rx_last + 1;
> + priv->msg_obj_tx_last =
> + priv->msg_obj_tx_first + priv->msg_obj_tx_num - 1;
> +
> + netif_napi_add(dev, &priv->napi, c_can_poll, priv->msg_obj_rx_num);
>
> priv->dev = dev;
> priv->can.bittiming_const = &c_can_bittiming_const;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h
> index 90d3d2e7a086..68295fab83d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h
> @@ -22,18 +22,7 @@
> #ifndef C_CAN_H
> #define C_CAN_H
>
> -/* message object split */
> #define C_CAN_NO_OF_OBJECTS 32
> -#define C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_NUM 16
> -#define C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_NUM 16
> -
> -#define C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_FIRST 1
> -#define C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_LAST (C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_FIRST + \
> - C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_NUM - 1)
> -
> -#define C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_FIRST (C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_LAST + 1)
> -
> -#define RECEIVE_OBJECT_BITS 0x0000ffff
>
> enum reg {
> C_CAN_CTRL_REG = 0,
> @@ -193,6 +182,14 @@ struct c_can_priv {
> struct napi_struct napi;
> struct net_device *dev;
> struct device *device;
> + unsigned int msg_obj_num;
> + unsigned int msg_obj_rx_num;
> + unsigned int msg_obj_tx_num;
> + unsigned int msg_obj_rx_first;
> + unsigned int msg_obj_rx_last;
> + unsigned int msg_obj_tx_first;
> + unsigned int msg_obj_tx_last;
> + u32 msg_obj_rx_mask;
> atomic_t tx_active;
> atomic_t sie_pending;
> unsigned long tx_dir;
> @@ -209,10 +206,10 @@ struct c_can_priv {
> void (*raminit) (const struct c_can_priv *priv, bool enable);
> u32 comm_rcv_high;
> u32 rxmasked;
> - u32 dlc[C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_NUM];
> + u32 dlc[];
> };
>
> -struct net_device *alloc_c_can_dev(void);
> +struct net_device *alloc_c_can_dev(int msg_obj_num);
> void free_c_can_dev(struct net_device *dev);
> int register_c_can_dev(struct net_device *dev);
> void unregister_c_can_dev(struct net_device *dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_pci.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_pci.c
> index 406b4847e5dc..3752f68d095e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_pci.c
> @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static int c_can_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> }
>
> /* allocate the c_can device */
> - dev = alloc_c_can_dev();
> + dev = alloc_c_can_dev(C_CAN_NO_OF_OBJECTS);
> if (!dev) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto out_iounmap;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c
> index 05f425ceb53a..a5b9b1a93702 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c
> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int c_can_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> /* allocate the c_can device */
> - dev = alloc_c_can_dev();
> + dev = alloc_c_can_dev(C_CAN_NO_OF_OBJECTS);
> if (!dev) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto exit;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists