lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210302193343.313318-8-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue,  2 Mar 2021 14:33:27 -0500
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     seanjc@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH 07/23] KVM: nSVM: do not mark all VMCB02 fields dirty on nested vmexit

Since L1 and L2 now use different VMCBs, most of the fields remain the
same in VMCB02 from one L2 run to the next.  Since KVM itself is not
looking at VMCB12's clean field, for now not much can be optimized.
However, in the future we could avoid more copies if the VMCB12's SEG
and DT sections are clean.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
index 4fc742ba1f1f..945c2a48b591 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
@@ -404,24 +404,32 @@ static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_save(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct vmcb *vmcb12
 	svm->vmcb->save.cs = vmcb12->save.cs;
 	svm->vmcb->save.ss = vmcb12->save.ss;
 	svm->vmcb->save.ds = vmcb12->save.ds;
+	svm->vmcb->save.cpl = vmcb12->save.cpl;
+	vmcb_mark_dirty(svm->vmcb, VMCB_SEG);
+
 	svm->vmcb->save.gdtr = vmcb12->save.gdtr;
 	svm->vmcb->save.idtr = vmcb12->save.idtr;
+	vmcb_mark_dirty(svm->vmcb, VMCB_DT);
+
 	kvm_set_rflags(&svm->vcpu, vmcb12->save.rflags | X86_EFLAGS_FIXED);
 	svm_set_efer(&svm->vcpu, vmcb12->save.efer);
 	svm_set_cr0(&svm->vcpu, vmcb12->save.cr0);
 	svm_set_cr4(&svm->vcpu, vmcb12->save.cr4);
-	svm->vmcb->save.cr2 = svm->vcpu.arch.cr2 = vmcb12->save.cr2;
+
+	svm->vcpu.arch.cr2 = vmcb12->save.cr2;
 	kvm_rax_write(&svm->vcpu, vmcb12->save.rax);
 	kvm_rsp_write(&svm->vcpu, vmcb12->save.rsp);
 	kvm_rip_write(&svm->vcpu, vmcb12->save.rip);
 
 	/* In case we don't even reach vcpu_run, the fields are not updated */
+	svm->vmcb->save.cr2 = svm->vcpu.arch.cr2;
 	svm->vmcb->save.rax = vmcb12->save.rax;
 	svm->vmcb->save.rsp = vmcb12->save.rsp;
 	svm->vmcb->save.rip = vmcb12->save.rip;
+
 	svm->vmcb->save.dr7 = vmcb12->save.dr7 | DR7_FIXED_1;
 	svm->vcpu.arch.dr6  = vmcb12->save.dr6 | DR6_ACTIVE_LOW;
-	svm->vmcb->save.cpl = vmcb12->save.cpl;
+	vmcb_mark_dirty(svm->vmcb, VMCB_DR);
 }
 
 static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
@@ -473,12 +481,10 @@ static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 	enter_guest_mode(&svm->vcpu);
 
 	/*
-	 * Merge guest and host intercepts - must be called  with vcpu in
-	 * guest-mode to take affect here
+	 * Merge guest and host intercepts - must be called with vcpu in
+	 * guest-mode to take effect.
 	 */
 	recalc_intercepts(svm);
-
-	vmcb_mark_all_dirty(svm->vmcb);
 }
 
 int enter_svm_guest_mode(struct vcpu_svm *svm, u64 vmcb12_gpa,
-- 
2.26.2


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ