[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQ+czV6u4CM-A+o5U+WhApkocunZXiCMJBB_Zbs0mvNSwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 12:24:04 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: Why do kprobes and uprobes singlestep?
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 10:38 AM Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Is there something like a uprobe test suite? How maintained /
> actively used is uprobe?
uprobe+bpf is heavily used in production.
selftests/bpf has only one test for it though.
Why are you asking?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists