[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210301161209.134240995@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 17:13:19 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 551/663] seccomp: Add missing return in non-void function
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
commit 04b38d012556199ba4c31195940160e0c44c64f0 upstream.
We don't actually care about the value, since the kernel will panic
before that; but a value should nonetheless be returned, otherwise the
compiler will complain.
Fixes: 8112c4f140fa ("seccomp: remove 2-phase API")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.7+
Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210111172839.640914-1-paul@crapouillou.net
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/seccomp.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -1050,6 +1050,8 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_sys
const bool recheck_after_trace)
{
BUG();
+
+ return -1;
}
#endif
Powered by blists - more mailing lists