[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210301161151.979499054@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 17:07:34 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 206/663] mm: proc: Invalidate TLB after clearing soft-dirty page state
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
[ Upstream commit 912efa17e5121693dfbadae29768f4144a3f9e62 ]
Since commit 0758cd830494 ("asm-generic/tlb: avoid potential double
flush"), TLB invalidation is elided in tlb_finish_mmu() if no entries
were batched via the tlb_remove_*() functions. Consequently, the
page-table modifications performed by clear_refs_write() in response to
a write to /proc/<pid>/clear_refs do not perform TLB invalidation.
Although this is fine when simply aging the ptes, in the case of
clearing the "soft-dirty" state we can end up with entries where
pte_write() is false, yet a writable mapping remains in the TLB.
Fix this by avoiding the mmu_gather API altogether: managing both the
'tlb_flush_pending' flag on the 'mm_struct' and explicit TLB
invalidation for the sort-dirty path, much like mprotect() does already.
Fixes: 0758cd830494 ("asm-generic/tlb: avoid potential double flushâ)
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210127235347.1402-2-will@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index 602e3a52884d8..3cec6fbef725e 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -1210,7 +1210,6 @@ static ssize_t clear_refs_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
struct mm_struct *mm;
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
enum clear_refs_types type;
- struct mmu_gather tlb;
int itype;
int rv;
@@ -1249,7 +1248,6 @@ static ssize_t clear_refs_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
goto out_unlock;
}
- tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, mm, 0, -1);
if (type == CLEAR_REFS_SOFT_DIRTY) {
for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_SOFTDIRTY))
@@ -1258,15 +1256,18 @@ static ssize_t clear_refs_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
vma_set_page_prot(vma);
}
+ inc_tlb_flush_pending(mm);
mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_SOFT_DIRTY,
0, NULL, mm, 0, -1UL);
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
}
walk_page_range(mm, 0, mm->highest_vm_end, &clear_refs_walk_ops,
&cp);
- if (type == CLEAR_REFS_SOFT_DIRTY)
+ if (type == CLEAR_REFS_SOFT_DIRTY) {
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
- tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb, 0, -1);
+ flush_tlb_mm(mm);
+ dec_tlb_flush_pending(mm);
+ }
out_unlock:
mmap_write_unlock(mm);
out_mm:
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists