[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210301161142.393649916@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 17:04:20 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 012/663] bfq: Avoid false bfq queue merging
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
commit 41e76c85660c022c6bf5713bfb6c21e64a487cec upstream.
bfq_setup_cooperator() uses bfqd->in_serv_last_pos so detect whether it
makes sense to merge current bfq queue with the in-service queue.
However if the in-service queue is freshly scheduled and didn't dispatch
any requests yet, bfqd->in_serv_last_pos is stale and contains value
from the previously scheduled bfq queue which can thus result in a bogus
decision that the two queues should be merged. This bug can be observed
for example with the following fio jobfile:
[global]
direct=0
ioengine=sync
invalidate=1
size=1g
rw=read
[reader]
numjobs=4
directory=/mnt
where the 4 processes will end up in the one shared bfq queue although
they do IO to physically very distant files (for some reason I was able to
observe this only with slice_idle=1ms setting).
Fix the problem by invalidating bfqd->in_serv_last_pos when switching
in-service queue.
Fixes: 058fdecc6de7 ("block, bfq: fix in-service-queue check for queue merging")
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Acked-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
block/bfq-iosched.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -2937,6 +2937,7 @@ static void __bfq_set_in_service_queue(s
}
bfqd->in_service_queue = bfqq;
+ bfqd->in_serv_last_pos = 0;
}
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists