lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 3 Mar 2021 08:18:16 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Leilk Liu <leilk.liu@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
        "luhua . xu" <luhua.xu@...iatek.com>,
        Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Pi-Hsun Shih <pihsun@...omium.org>,
        Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
        Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
        Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
        Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        fparent@...libre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: mediatek: Re-license MTK SPI driver as Dual MIT/GPL

On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 10:56:36AM +0800, Leilk Liu wrote:
> From: "leilk.liu" <leilk.liu@...iatek.com>
> 
> It is wanted to use MTK spi bus driver with GPL-2.0 or MIT license.
> But now it is only licensed as GPL-2.0, so re-license it as dual
> MIT/GPL.
> 
> Signed-off-by: leilk.liu <leilk.liu@...iatek.com>

Please use your name here, not an email alias for where your name goes.


> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-mt65xx.c                 | 4 ++--
>  include/linux/platform_data/spi-mt65xx.h | 2 +-

Given that these files have been licensed under the GPL only since 2015,
all changes contributed to it have only been licensed under the GPL as
well, so have you gotten approval for all of the contributors for this
change?

Can you please get your lawyer to also sign off on this license change
patch, so that we know that you have their approval for this incase
there are questions about it in the future?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ