[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 12:01:17 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: taehyun cho <taehyun.cho@...sung.com>, balbi@...nel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: make USB_DWC3_EXYNOS independent
On 03/03/2021 11:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 11:30:38AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>
>> Just let any arch pick any driver if it can be built, you never know
>> what it might be run on. Removing ARCH_ dependencies in Kconfig files
>> is a good thing, please do not discourage that from happening.
If this is the consensus, then I'll add to my todo list removal of
ARCH_EXYNOS, ARCH_S3C, ARCH_S5P (and later OMAP, QCOM, NXP and so on)
from all drivers. Blindly. Because DWC Exynos is the same as watchdog,
clocksource timer, PWM, GPIO/pinctrl
Are everyone okay with that?
I remember also someone from Suse wanted the opposite - be sure that
none of SoC related options appear for his choices, when he configures
his kernel without Exynos support. I can't remember the name though...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists