[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:27:50 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: Why do kprobes and uprobes singlestep?
On 03/02, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>
> Especially if such tightening will come with performance boost for
> uprobe on a nop and unprobe at the start (which is typically push or
> alu on %sp).
> That would be a great step forward.
Just in case, nop and push are emulated without additional overhead.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists