[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 15:43:37 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To: Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-pm <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Introduce the for_each_set_clump macro
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 2:19 PM Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Bartosz,
>
> Since this patchset primarily affects GPIO drivers, would you like
> to pick it up through your GPIO tree?
>
Sure, as soon as you figure out what's wrong with the xilinx patch.
Could you also follow William's suggestion and rename the functions?
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists