[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 10:00:12 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] printk: Make %pS and friends print module build ID
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 11:25:58 +0100
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
> Alternative solution would be to minimize the information, for
> example, by printing only the modules that appear in the backtrace.
> But this might be complicated to implement.
It could be a list after the backtrace perhaps, and not part of the
"modules linked in"?
But then you need a generic way of capturing those modules in the backtrace
that works for every architecture.
Honestly, I don't even know what a buildid is, and it is totally useless
information for myself. What exactly is it used for?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists