[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YEDcpAtQAc2Mu6Wz@workstation.tuxnet>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 14:12:04 +0100
From: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@...ruber.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] pwm: pca9685: Switch to atomic API
Hi Uwe,
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 10:44:07PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Clemens,
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 10:22:22PM +0100, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> > + if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> We agreed on -EINVAL for that one since 2b1c1a5d5148.
>
> Other than that the patch looks ok (but note I only looked quickly).
Thanks for looking over it. This will be -EINVAL in the next revision.
Best regards,
Clemens
Powered by blists - more mailing lists