[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1614870454-18709-1-git-send-email-beata.michalska@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 15:07:34 +0000
From: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: vireshk@...nel.org, nm@...com, sboyd@...nel.org,
beata.michalska@....com
Subject: [PATCH] opp: Invalidate current opp when draining the opp list
The current_opp when set, grabs additional reference on the opp,
which is then supposed to be dropped upon releasing the opp table.
Still both dev_pm_opp_remove_table and dev_pm_opp_remove_all_dynamic
will completely drain the OPPs list, including dropping the additional
reference on current_opp. This may lead to an attempt to access
memory that has already been released. Make sure that while draining
the list (in both dynamic and static cases) the current_opp gets
actually invalidated.
Fixes: 81c4d8a3c414 ("opp: Keep track of currently programmed OPP")
Signed-off-by: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@....com>
---
drivers/opp/core.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c
index c268938..10e65c4 100644
--- a/drivers/opp/core.c
+++ b/drivers/opp/core.c
@@ -1502,10 +1502,39 @@ static struct dev_pm_opp *_opp_get_next(struct opp_table *opp_table,
return opp;
}
-bool _opp_remove_all_static(struct opp_table *opp_table)
+static int __opp_drain_list(struct opp_table *opp_table, bool dynamic)
{
struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
+ int count = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Can't remove the OPP from under the lock, debugfs removal needs to
+ * happen lock less to avoid circular dependency issues.
+ */
+ while ((opp = _opp_get_next(opp_table, dynamic))) {
+ /*
+ * The current_opp has extra hold on the ref count,
+ * still the draining here will result in all of them
+ * being dropped completely, so make
+ * sure no one will try to access the current_opp
+ * afterwords
+ */
+ if (opp_table->current_opp == opp &&
+ !(kref_read(&opp->kref) - 1))
+ opp_table->current_opp = NULL;
+
+ dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
+ /*
+ * Note: the count here will reflect number of references
+ * dropped, not the number of opps in the list
+ */
+ ++count;
+ }
+ return count;
+}
+bool _opp_remove_all_static(struct opp_table *opp_table)
+{
mutex_lock(&opp_table->lock);
if (!opp_table->parsed_static_opps) {
@@ -1520,13 +1549,7 @@ bool _opp_remove_all_static(struct opp_table *opp_table)
mutex_unlock(&opp_table->lock);
- /*
- * Can't remove the OPP from under the lock, debugfs removal needs to
- * happen lock less to avoid circular dependency issues.
- */
- while ((opp = _opp_get_next(opp_table, false)))
- dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
-
+ __opp_drain_list(opp_table, false);
return true;
}
@@ -1539,21 +1562,13 @@ bool _opp_remove_all_static(struct opp_table *opp_table)
void dev_pm_opp_remove_all_dynamic(struct device *dev)
{
struct opp_table *opp_table;
- struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
int count = 0;
opp_table = _find_opp_table(dev);
if (IS_ERR(opp_table))
return;
- /*
- * Can't remove the OPP from under the lock, debugfs removal needs to
- * happen lock less to avoid circular dependency issues.
- */
- while ((opp = _opp_get_next(opp_table, true))) {
- dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
- count++;
- }
+ count = __opp_drain_list(opp_table, true);
/* Drop the references taken by dev_pm_opp_add() */
while (count--)
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists