[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c76c82668142710ba5a7a8454759c9aa2423d72f.camel@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 16:11:50 +0100
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stijn@...ux-ipv6.be, ynezz@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwrng: bcm2835: set quality to 1000
On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 10:29 +0100, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
> Hi Herbert,
>
> > El 3 mar 2021, a las 10:20, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> escribió:
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 08:12:45PM +0100, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
> > >
> > > I ran rngtest and this is what I got:
> >
> > This is meaningless except for sources that have not been whitened.
> >
> > Your justification needs to be based on what the hardware does or
> > is documented to do.
>
> Ok, so I guess that we’re never setting that value to anything since there’s
> no public documentation about that ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
@Florian, is there a way you might be able to get the official value?
Regards,
Nicolas
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists