[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210304153204.GI12147@stor-presley.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 07:32:04 -0800
From: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: cang@...eaurora.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Nitin Rawat <nitirawa@...eaurora.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/2] ufs: sysfs: Resume the proper scsi device
On Thu, Mar 04 2021 at 23:45 -0800, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>On 3/03/21 12:52 am, Asutosh Das wrote:
>> Resumes the actual scsi device the unit descriptor of which
>> is being accessed instead of the hba alone.
>
>Since "scsi: ufs: ufs-debugfs: Add user-defined exception_event_mask"
>is now in linux-next, a similar change is needed for ufs-debugfs.c.
>Probably best it is a separate patch though.
>
Ok Sure, I'll push a separate patch.
If there're not any other concerns, please can you ack these changes.
Thanks,
-asd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists