[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d67580bc-6178-6c7f-54c8-a3dffe8d554d@xilinx.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 17:22:59 +0100
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To: Piyush Mehta <piyush.mehta@...inx.com>, <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC: <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<git@...inx.com>, <sgoud@...inx.com>, <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: ahci: ceva: Updated code by using dev_err_probe()
On 3/4/21 4:53 PM, Piyush Mehta wrote:
> Updated code with already prepared dev_err_probe(). It reduces code size
> and simplifies EPROBE_DEFER handling.
>
> Also, unify message format for similar error cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Piyush Mehta <piyush.mehta@...inx.com>
> ---
> This patch is based on ahci-ceva patches:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=5542fabd9e07d6c49c07862e73070c325f93d390
>
> Tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/tree/?h=for-next
> ---
> drivers/ata/ahci_ceva.c | 5 ++---
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_ceva.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_ceva.c
> index b980218..a935209 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_ceva.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_ceva.c
> @@ -207,9 +207,8 @@ static int ceva_ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> cevapriv->rst = devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive(&pdev->dev,
> NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(cevapriv->rst)) {
> - if (PTR_ERR(cevapriv->rst) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get reset: %ld\n",
> - PTR_ERR(cevapriv->rst));
> + dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(cevapriv->rst),
> + "failed to get reset\n");
> }
I got it twice not sure why.
nit: Sorry I didn't spot it in the first internal review.
But you can also remove that {} around.
With that fixed please add my
Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Thanks,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists