[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210304171940.GL2723601@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 17:19:40 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] printk: Make %pS and friends print module build ID
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 09:43:19PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 09:47:47 -0800
> Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> > The %pS printk format (among some others) is used to print kernel
> > addresses symbolically. When the kernel prints an address inside of a
> > module, the kernel prints the addresses' symbol name along with the
> > module's name that contains the address. Let's make kernel stacktraces
> > easier to identify on KALLSYMS builds by including the build ID of a
> > module when we print the address.
>
> Please no!
>
> This kills the output of tracing with offset, and can possibly break
> scripts. I don't want to look at traces like this!
>
> <idle>-0 [004] ..s1 353.842577: ipv4_conntrack_in+0x0/0x10 [nf_conntrack] (3b39eb771b2566331887f671c741f90bfba0b051) <-nf_hook_slow+0x40/0xb0
Would it make sense to only print the build-id if it differs from the
build-id of the kernel which has loaded it?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists