linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 XRT Alveo 03/18] fpga: xrt: xclbin file helper functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8d65e7bb-0ffe-dde1-8dce-527131e0bebe@xilinx.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Mar 2021 10:53:09 -0800
From:   Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@...inx.com>
To:     Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>, Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@...inx.com>
CC:     Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org>, <maxz@...inx.com>,
        <sonal.santan@...inx.com>, <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        <stefanos@...inx.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <robh@...nel.org>, Max Zhen <max.zhen@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 XRT Alveo 03/18] fpga: xrt: xclbin file helper
 functions

Hi Moritz,


On 03/02/2021 07:14 AM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 04:25:37PM -0800, Lizhi Hou wrote:
>> Hi Tom，
>>
>>
>> On 02/28/2021 08:54 AM, Tom Rix wrote:
>>> CAUTION: This message has originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/26/21 1:23 PM, Lizhi Hou wrote:
>>>> Hi Tom,
>>>>
>>>>
>>> snip
>>>
>>>>> I also do not see a pragma pack, usually this is set of 1 so the compiler does not shuffle elements, increase size etc.
>>>> This data structure is shared with other tools. And the structure is well defined with reasonable alignment. It is compatible with all compilers we have tested. So pragma pack is not necessary.
>>> You can not have possibly tested all the configurations since the kernel supports many arches and compilers.
>>>
>>> If the tested existing alignment is ok, pragma pack should be a noop on your tested configurations.
>>>
>>> And help cover the untested configurations.
>> Got it. I will add pragma pack(1).
> Please do not use pragma pack(), add __packed to the structs in
> question.
Ok, I will use __packed.

Thanks,
Lizhi
>
> - Moritz