| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 20:42:42 +0100
From: Henning Schild <henning.schild@...mens.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
Srikanth Krishnakar <skrishnakar@...il.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Gerd Haeussler <gerd.haeussler.ext@...mens.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] platform/x86: simatic-ipc: add main driver for
Siemens devices
Am Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:11:12 +0200
schrieb Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:36 AM Henning Schild
> <henning.schild@...mens.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Henning Schild <henning.schild@...mens.com>
> >
> > This mainly implements detection of these devices and will allow
> > secondary drivers to work on such machines.
> >
> > The identification is DMI-based with a vendor specific way to tell
> > them apart in a reliable way.
> >
> > Drivers for LEDs and Watchdogs will follow to make use of that
> > platform detection.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Gerd Haeussler <gerd.haeussler.ext@...mens.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Henning Schild <henning.schild@...mens.com>
>
> The order is wrong taking into account the From line in the body. So,
> it's not clear who is the author, who is a co-developer, and who is
> the committer (one person may utilize few roles).
> Check for the rest of the series as well (basically this is the rule
> of thumb to recheck entire code for the comment you have got at any
> single place of it).
For some code Gerd is the author, and i am the co-Author. We even have
Jan in the mix at places. At least in copyright headers.
I will remain the committer for the three of us. And since i do not
know exactly what the problem is i will add only my Signed-off to avoid
confusion.
Please speak up it that would be wrong as well and point me to the docs
i missed. Or tell me how it should be done.
> ...
>
> > +config SIEMENS_SIMATIC_IPC
> > + tristate "Siemens Simatic IPC Class driver"
> > + depends on PCI
> > + help
> > + This Simatic IPC class driver is the central of several
> > drivers. It
> > + is mainly used for system identification, after which
> > drivers in other
> > + classes will take care of driving specifics of those
> > machines.
> > + i.e. leds and watchdogs
>
> LEDs
> watchdog. (missed period and singular form)
>
> Module name?
>
> > endif # X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES
>
> Not sure about the ordering of the section in Kconfig, but it is up to
> maintainers.
>
> ...
>
> > +# Siemens Simatic Industrial PCs
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SIEMENS_SIMATIC_IPC) += simatic-ipc.o
>
> Ditto.
I will check both again if a find a pattern, otherwise will wait for
maintainers to complain and hopefully suggest.
> ...
>
> > + * Siemens SIMATIC IPC driver for LEDs
>
> It seems to be used in patch 4 which is not LED related. Also, why is
> it here if it's for LEDs?
>
> ...
>
> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> > modify
> > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2
> > as
> > + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>
> Replace with SPDX
>
> ...
>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>
> Ordered?
>
> > +#include <linux/platform_data/x86/simatic-ipc.h>
>
> ...
>
> > +static int register_platform_devices(u32 station_id)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > + u8 ledmode = SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_NONE;
> > + u8 wdtmode = SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_NONE;
>
> Reversed xmas tree order?
I do not get this, it is almost easter egg order time. Please explain.
> > + platform_data.devmode = SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_NONE;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(device_modes); i++) {
> > + if (device_modes[i].station_id == station_id) {
> > + ledmode = device_modes[i].led_mode;
> > + wdtmode = device_modes[i].wdt_mode;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (ledmode != SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_NONE) {
> > + platform_data.devmode = ledmode;
>
> > + ipc_led_platform_device =
> > platform_device_register_data
> > + (NULL, KBUILD_MODNAME "_leds",
> > PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> > + &platform_data, sizeof(struct
> > simatic_ipc_platform));
>
> Strange indentation (second line).
>
> > + if (IS_ERR(ipc_led_platform_device))
> > + return PTR_ERR(ipc_led_platform_device);
>
> > + pr_debug(KBUILD_MODNAME ": device=%s created\n",
> > + ipc_led_platform_device->name);
>
> Utilize pr_fmt() instead of adding prefixes like this.
>
> > + }
>
> > + if (wdtmode != SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_NONE) {
> > + platform_data.devmode = wdtmode;
> > + ipc_wdt_platform_device =
> > platform_device_register_data
> > + (NULL, KBUILD_MODNAME "_wdt",
> > PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> > + &platform_data, sizeof(struct
> > simatic_ipc_platform));
> > + if (IS_ERR(ipc_wdt_platform_device))
> > + return PTR_ERR(ipc_wdt_platform_device);
> > +
> > + pr_debug(KBUILD_MODNAME ": device=%s created\n",
> > + ipc_wdt_platform_device->name);
> > + }
>
> Same comments as above.
>
> > + if (ledmode == SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_NONE &&
> > + wdtmode == SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_NONE) {
> > + pr_warn(KBUILD_MODNAME
> > + ": unsupported IPC detected, station
> > id=%08x\n",
> > + station_id);
>
> Ugly indentation. With pr_fmt() in use will be much better.
>
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> > + } else {
>
> Redundant.
>
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +}
>
> ...
>
> > +/*
> > + * Get membase address from PCI, used in leds and wdt modul. Here
> > we read
> > + * the bar0. The final address calculation is done in the
> > appropriate modules
>
> bar -> BAR
> Missed period.
>
> > + */
>
> > +
>
> Unneeded blank line.
>
> > +u32 simatic_ipc_get_membase0(unsigned int p2sb)
> > +{
> > + u32 bar0 = 0;
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
>
> It's ugly besides the fact that you have a dependency.
left over from out-of-tree, will be removed
rest is clear, Thanks!
Henning
> > + struct pci_bus *bus;
>
> Missed blank line.
>
> > + /*
> > + * The GPIO memory is bar0 of the hidden P2SB device.
> > Unhide the device
> > + * to have a quick look at it, before we hide it again.
> > + * Also grab the pci rescan lock so that device does not
> > get discovered
> > + * and remapped while it is visible.
> > + * This code is inspired by drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c
> > + */
> > + bus = pci_find_bus(0, 0);
> > + pci_lock_rescan_remove();
> > + pci_bus_write_config_byte(bus, p2sb, 0xE1, 0x0);
> > + pci_bus_read_config_dword(bus, p2sb, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0,
> > &bar0); +
> > + bar0 &= ~0xf;
> > + pci_bus_write_config_byte(bus, p2sb, 0xE1, 0x1);
> > + pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI */
> > + return bar0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(simatic_ipc_get_membase0);
>
> Oy vey! I know what this is and let's do it differently. I have some
> (relatively old) patch series I can send you privately for testing.
>
> ...
>
> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> > modify
> > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2
> > as
> > + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>
> Not needed when you have SPDX.
>
> ...
>
> > +#include <linux/pci.h>
>
> Wrong header. Should be types.h
>
> ...
>
> > +#include <linux/dmi.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_data/x86/simatic-ipc-base.h>
>
> Missed headers. You need to include ones that the code below is a
> direct user of.
>
> Like types.h
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists