[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4b4f1d1-8041-3563-708a-850fe95549b8@denx.de>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 22:07:22 +0100
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Angus Ainslie <angus@...ea.ca>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Martin Kepplinger <martink@...teo.de>,
Sebastian Krzyszkowiak <sebastian.krzyszkowiak@...i.sm>,
Siva Rebbagondla <siva8118@...il.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 050/217] rsi: Fix TX EAPOL packet handling
against iwlwifi AP
On 3/4/21 9:47 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 08:25:49PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 12/23/20 3:13 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>
>> Hello Sasha,
>>
>>> From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
>>>
>>> [ Upstream commit 65277100caa2f2c62b6f3c4648b90d6f0435f3bc ]
>>>
>>> In case RSI9116 SDIO WiFi operates in STA mode against Intel 9260 in
>>> AP mode,
>>> the association fails. The former is using wpa_supplicant during
>>> association,
>>> the later is set up using hostapd:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Was this patch possibly missed from 5.10.y ?
>
> I'm not sure what happened there, but I can queue it up.
Thank you
>> Also, while at it, I think it might make sense to pick the following
>> two patches as well, they dramatically reduce interrupt rate of the
>> RSI WiFi device, so it stops overloading lower-end devices:
>> 287431463e786 ("rsi: Move card interrupt handling to RX thread")
>
> And this one too.
Thanks
>> abd131a19f6b8 ("rsi: Clean up loop in the interrupt handler")
>
> But not this one, it looks like just a cleanup. Why is it needed?
Now I got confused, yes, please skip abd131a19f6b8, thanks for spotting
it. (I still have one more patch for the RSI wifi which I need to send
out, but that's for later)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists