[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210304001134.22977-3-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 16:11:31 -0800
From: paulmck@...nel.org
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/6] kvfree_rcu: Make krc_this_cpu_unlock() use raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore()
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
The krc_this_cpu_unlock() function does a raw_spin_unlock() immediately
followed by a local_irq_restore(). This commit saves a line of code by
merging them into a raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(). This transformation
also reduces scheduling latency because raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore()
responds immediately to a reschedule request. In contrast,
local_irq_restore() does a scheduling-oblivious enabling of interrupts.
Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 08b5044..7ee83f3 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3229,8 +3229,7 @@ krc_this_cpu_lock(unsigned long *flags)
static inline void
krc_this_cpu_unlock(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp, unsigned long flags)
{
- raw_spin_unlock(&krcp->lock);
- local_irq_restore(flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
}
static inline struct kvfree_rcu_bulk_data *
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists