linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 05/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add RSC and PDC devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <161481625091.1478170.8810587061043612400@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Wed, 03 Mar 2021 16:04:10 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>, agross@...nel.org,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add RSC and PDC devices

Quoting Rajendra Nayak (2021-03-03 04:17:49)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> index 4a56d9c..21c2399 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> @@ -30,6 +31,18 @@
>                 };
>         };
>  
> +       reserved_memory: reserved-memory {

Do we plan to use this label at any point? I'd prefer we remove this
until it becomes useful.

> +               #address-cells = <2>;
> +               #size-cells = <2>;
> +               ranges;
> +
> +               aop_cmd_db_mem: memory@...60000 {
> +                       reg = <0x0 0x80860000 0x0 0x20000>;
> +                       compatible = "qcom,cmd-db";
> +                       no-map;
> +               };
> +       };
> +
>         cpus {
>                 #address-cells = <2>;
>                 #size-cells = <0>;
> @@ -203,6 +229,7 @@
>                         interrupt-controller;
>                         #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>                         gpio-ranges = <&tlmm 0 0 175>;
> +                       wakeup-parent = <&pdc>;
>  
>                         qup_uart5_default: qup-uart5-default {
>                                 pins = "gpio46", "gpio47";
> @@ -287,6 +314,23 @@
>                                 status = "disabled";
>                         };
>                 };
> +
> +               apps_rsc: rsc@...00000 {

Any better name than 'rsc'? Maybe 'power-controller'?

> +                       compatible = "qcom,rpmh-rsc";
> +                       reg = <0 0x18200000 0 0x10000>,
> +                             <0 0x18210000 0 0x10000>,
> +                             <0 0x18220000 0 0x10000>;
> +                       reg-names = "drv-0", "drv-1", "drv-2";
> +                       interrupts = <GIC_SPI 3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +                                    <GIC_SPI 4 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +                                    <GIC_SPI 5 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +                       qcom,tcs-offset = <0xd00>;
> +                       qcom,drv-id = <2>;
> +                       qcom,tcs-config = <ACTIVE_TCS  2>,
> +                                         <SLEEP_TCS   3>,
> +                                         <WAKE_TCS    3>,
> +                                         <CONTROL_TCS 1>;
> +               };
>         };