linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/12] rcu: Make nocb_nobypass_lim_per

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210304002311.23655-8-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed,  3 Mar 2021 16:23:07 -0800
From:   paulmck@...nel.org
To:     rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
        oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/12] rcu: Make nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy static

From: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>

RCU triggerse the following sparse warning:

kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:1497:5: warning: symbol
'nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy' was not declared. Should it be static?

This commit therefore makes this variable static.

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 93d3938..a1a17ad 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -1556,7 +1556,7 @@ early_param("rcu_nocb_poll", parse_rcu_nocb_poll);
  * After all, the main point of bypassing is to avoid lock contention
  * on ->nocb_lock, which only can happen at high call_rcu() rates.
  */
-int nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy = 16 * 1000 / HZ;
+static int nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy = 16 * 1000 / HZ;
 module_param(nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy, int, 0);
 
 /*
-- 
2.9.5