| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <88d2481d-5435-1ffb-dc98-5534c446bd52@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 10:58:57 +0800
From: "Xu, Like" <like.xu@...el.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, wei.w.wang@...el.com,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] KVM: vmx/pmu: Add MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL emulation for
Arch LBR
On 2021/3/4 1:19, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021, Like Xu wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
>> index 25d620685ae7..d14a14eb712d 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>> #include "pmu.h"
>>
>> #define MSR_PMC_FULL_WIDTH_BIT (MSR_IA32_PMC0 - MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0)
>> +#define KVM_ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK 0x7f000f
> It would nice to build this up with the individual bits instead of tossing in a
> magic number.
I will move the mask ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK from lbr.c to msr-index.h and thus,
#define KVM_ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK (ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK | ARCH_LBR_CTL_LBREN)
I assume the move operation would be a separate patch for host side.
>
>> static struct kvm_event_hw_type_mapping intel_arch_events[] = {
>> /* Index must match CPUID 0x0A.EBX bit vector */
>> @@ -221,6 +222,7 @@ static bool intel_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
>> ret = pmu->version > 1;
>> break;
>> case MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH:
>> + case MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL:
>> ret = guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR);
>> break;
>> default:
>> @@ -390,6 +392,9 @@ static int intel_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>> case MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH:
>> msr_info->data = lbr_desc->records.nr;
>> return 0;
>> + case MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL:
>> + msr_info->data = vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL);
>> + return 0;
>> default:
>> if ((pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0)) ||
>> (pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PMC0))) {
>> @@ -457,6 +462,15 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>> lbr_desc->records.nr = data;
>> lbr_desc->arch_lbr_reset = true;
>> return 0;
>> + case MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL:
>> + if (!(data & ~KVM_ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK)) {
> Maybe invert this to reduce indentation?
>
> if (data & ...)
> break; (or "return 1;")
Fine to me.
>
>
>> + vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL, data);
>> + if (intel_pmu_lbr_is_enabled(vcpu) && !lbr_desc->event &&
>> + (data & ARCH_LBR_CTL_LBREN))
> Alignment.
I'll fix it.
>
>> + intel_pmu_create_guest_lbr_event(vcpu);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> + break;
>> default:
>> if ((pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0)) ||
>> (pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PMC0))) {
>> @@ -635,12 +649,15 @@ static void intel_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> */
>> static void intel_pmu_legacy_freezing_lbrs_on_pmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> {
>> - u64 data = vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL);
>> + u32 lbr_ctl_field = GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL;
>>
>> - if (data & DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI) {
>> - data &= ~DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR;
>> - vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL, data);
>> - }
>> + if (!(vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL) & DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + if (guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
>> + lbr_ctl_field = GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL;
>> +
>> + vmcs_write64(lbr_ctl_field, vmcs_read64(lbr_ctl_field) & ~BIT(0));
> Use ARCH_LBR_CTL_LBREN?
I'm trying to unify the usage of EN bit for both Arch LBR and legacy LBR:
#define ARCH_LBR_CTL_LBREN BIT(0)
#define DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR (1UL << 0)
Any suggestion ?
>
>> }
>>
>> static void intel_pmu_deliver_pmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> index 6d7e760fdfa0..a0660b9934c6 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> @@ -2036,6 +2036,13 @@ static int vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>> VM_EXIT_SAVE_DEBUG_CONTROLS)
>> get_vmcs12(vcpu)->guest_ia32_debugctl = data;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * For Arch LBR, IA32_DEBUGCTL[bit 0] has no meaning.
>> + * It can be written to 0 or 1, but reads will always return 0.
>> + */
>> + if (guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
>> + data &= ~DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR;
>> +
>> vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL, data);
>> if (intel_pmu_lbr_is_enabled(vcpu) && !to_vmx(vcpu)->lbr_desc.event &&
>> (data & DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR))
>> @@ -4463,6 +4470,8 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
>> vmcs_writel(GUEST_SYSENTER_ESP, 0);
>> vmcs_writel(GUEST_SYSENTER_EIP, 0);
>> vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL, 0);
>> + if (cpu_has_vmx_arch_lbr())
>> + vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL, 0);
> Not that any guest is likely to care, but is the MSR cleared on INIT? The SDM
> has specific language for warm reset, but I can't find anything for INIT.
>
> On a warm reset, all LBR MSRs, including IA32_LBR_DEPTH, have their values
> preserved. However, IA32_LBR_CTL.LBREn is cleared to 0, disabling LBRs. If a
> warm reset is triggered while the processor is in C6, also known as warm init,
> all LBR MSRs will be reset to their initial values.
I was told that the reset behavior of GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL
would be the same as the GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL (true for INIT as well).
It looks we have not strictly distinguished the guest's power concept C*.
Do we have two trap paths for "warm reset" and "warm init" ?
>
>> }
>>
>> kvm_set_rflags(vcpu, X86_EFLAGS_FIXED);
>> --
>> 2.29.2
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists