[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29906974.JcgKRUyaEZ@nvdebian>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 15:27:16 +1100
From: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<bskeggs@...hat.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
<rcampbell@...dia.com>, <jglisse@...hat.com>, <hch@...radead.org>,
<daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] mm/rmap: Split try_to_munlock from try_to_unmap
On Tuesday, 2 March 2021 3:10:49 AM AEDT Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > + while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) {
> > + /*
> > + * If the page is mlock()d, we cannot swap it out.
> > + * If it's recently referenced (perhaps page_referenced
> > + * skipped over this mm) then we should reactivate it.
> > + */
> > + if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) {
>
> And since we write the data without holding the PTLs this looks
> pointless, unless there is some other VM_LOCKED manipulation
>
Thanks. I couldn't find any other manipulation of VM_LOCKED whilst holding the
PTL so I'll remove this redundant check.
- Alistair
Powered by blists - more mailing lists