[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <94311b42ef6ee34ba5908fcefefa4010@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 14:25:15 +0800
From: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
To: daejun7.park@...sung.com
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, avri.altman@....com,
jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
asutoshd@...eaurora.org, stanley.chu@...iatek.com,
bvanassche@....org, huobean@...il.com,
ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
JinHwan Park <jh.i.park@...sung.com>,
Javier Gonzalez <javier.gonz@...sung.com>,
SEUNGUK SHIN <seunguk.shin@...sung.com>,
Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@...sung.com>,
Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@...sung.com>,
BoRam Shin <boram.shin@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v26 4/4] scsi: ufs: Add HPB 2.0 support
>
> - if (!ufshpb_is_support_chunk(transfer_len))
> - return;
> + if (!ufshpb_is_support_chunk(hpb, transfer_len) &&
> + (ufshpb_is_legacy(hba) && (transfer_len !=
> HPB_LEGACY_CHUNK_HIGH)))
> + return 0;
>
This is looks awkward, can we put the checks in
ufshpb_is_support_chunk()?
Thanks,
Can Guo.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists