linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] iwlwifi: don't call netif_napi_add() with rxq->lock held (was Re: Lockdep warning in iwl_pcie_rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2103032018080.12405@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date:   Wed, 3 Mar 2021 20:19:33 +0100 (CET)
From:   Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
cc:     Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iwlwifi: don't call netif_napi_add() with rxq->lock
 held (was Re: Lockdep warning in iwl_pcie_rx_handle())

On Wed, 3 Mar 2021, Kalle Valo wrote:

> > ... i believe you want to drop the "(was ...") part from the patch 
> > subject.
> 
> Too late now, it's already applied and pull request sent. Why was it
> there in the first place?

Yeah, it was, but I don't think it's a big issue :) So let it be.

BTW, how about the other fix I sent? It's also fixing a real functional 
issue, so it IMHO is a -rc material

	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/nycvar.YFH.7.76.2103021125430.12405@cbobk.fhfr.pm/

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs