[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210304093306.GA20721@willie-the-truck>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:33:07 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Max Uvarov <muvarov@...il.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: cpufeatures: Fix handling of
CONFIG_CMDLINE for idreg overrides
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 04:30:21PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 7:50 AM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > The built-in kernel commandline (CONFIG_CMDLINE) can be configured in
> > three different ways:
> >
> > 1. CMDLINE_FORCE: Use CONFIG_CMDLINE instead of any bootloader args
> > 2. CMDLINE_EXTEND: Append the bootloader args to CONFIG_CMDLINE
> > 3. CMDLINE_FROM_BOOTLOADER: Only use CONFIG_CMDLINE if there aren't
> > any bootloader args.
> >
> > The early cmdline parsing to detect idreg overrides gets (2) and (3)
> > slightly wrong: in the case of (2) the bootloader args are parsed first
> > and in the case of (3) the CMDLINE is always parsed.
> >
> > Fix these issues by moving the bootargs parsing out into a helper
> > function and following the same logic as that used by the EFI stub.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> > Fixes: 33200303553d ("arm64: cpufeature: Add an early command-line cpufeature override facility")
> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> It bothers me a bit having command line handling here. It means how
> the command line is assembled in 2 places.
It's more than 2 places, it's also done in the EFI stub; see efi_pe_entry()
in drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub.c. That's why I'm pushing on this,
because at the moment the command-line reported by /proc/cmdline doesn't
match the command-line that was parsed there because they stitch it together
in opposite orders when CMDLINE_EXTEND is used.
> I guess if we get rid of ambiguous 'extend' then it's better, but perhaps
> a better implementation would be an api get a specific command line
> parameter. The main downside would be searching the DT again for each
> parameter if we can't store any data in between calls, but there's ways
> around that. PowerPC also needs similar functionality in
> disabled_on_cmdline().
Christophe's patches at least aim to put the assembling all in one place,
although we'll have to see whether or not it can be used in the EFI stub
environment.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists